Oregon Appellate Court - June 12, 2013
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Zara Lukens and Abassos • June 12, 2013 • no comments
(Created page with "<summary hidden> * Driver stopped when passenger’s license taken </summary> '''Driver stopped when passenger’s license taken''' A driver is stopped when an officer tak...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* The word ‘use' in ORS 166.220(1)(a) - unlawful use of a weapon - describes both the actual use of physical force and the threat of immediate use of physical force. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A149837.pdf "State v. Boggs"], 257 Or. App.__ (2013) | * The word ‘use' in ORS 166.220(1)(a) - unlawful use of a weapon - describes both the actual use of physical force and the threat of immediate use of physical force. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A149837.pdf "State v. Boggs"], 257 Or. App.__ (2013) | ||
| − | {{wl-publish: 2013-06-12 11:50:37 -0700 | | + | {{wl-publish: 2013-06-12 11:50:37 -0700 | Zara Lukens }} |
| + | {{wl-publish: 2013-06-12 11:50:37 -0700 | abassos }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:53, August 18, 2013
Driver stopped when passenger’s license taken
A driver is stopped when an officer takes the driver’s name and the passenger’s ID to conduct a warrants check. "State v. Dierks", 257 Or. App.__(2013).
PER CURIAM OPINIONS:
- Restitution is inappropriate in the absence of a causal relationship between the defendant’s criminal conduct and the victim's economic loss. "State v. McDonald', 257 Or. App. __
- The word ‘use' in ORS 166.220(1)(a) - unlawful use of a weapon - describes both the actual use of physical force and the threat of immediate use of physical force. "State v. Boggs", 257 Or. App.__ (2013)
