A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Case Reviews

From OCDLA Library of Defense
Jump to: navigation, search


Go here to see a list of:
2019 Case Summaries by Topic'
2018 Case Summaries by Topic
2017 Case Summaries by Topic
2016 Case Summaries by Topic
2015 Case Summaries by Topic


___________________________________________________________________

Oregon Supreme Court--February 28,2019

EVIDENCE — Hearsay, official records, and business records. Records generated by police agencies are not admissible as business records but may be admissible as official records. Reversed and remanded for new trial. State v. Edmonds 364 Or 410 (February 28, 2019) (Balmer) (Clackamas County, Van Dyk)

FAILURE TO APPEAR — 'Released from custody' element of offense A book-and-release process ordered by a judge is not 'custody,' as that term is used in the failure-to-appear statutes, and therefore the court erred in denying a motion for judgment of acquittal. Reversed. State v. McColly 364 Or 464 (February 28, 2019) (Nelson) (Tillamook County, Stevens)

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF — Statute of limitations escape clause Post-conviction petitioner was advised of potential immigration consequences at the time of his plea, and therefore his ignorance of those consequences did not toll the statute of limitations. Affirmed. The court also noted that the record raised the issue of whether the petitioner's mental disabilities were a basis to toll the statute of limitations. But, because petitioner alleged, in a declaration attached to the petition, that he would not have pleaded guilty if he had known the immigration consequences, the court held that he was mentally competent to understand the significance of immigration consequences. The court further noted that the evidence of defendant's mental disabilities did not show that it prevented him from consulting with counsel or timely filing a petition. Perez-Rodriguez v. State 364 Or 489 (February 28, 2019) (Nelson, Balmer dissenting) (Washington County, Kohl)

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF — Statute of limitations escape clause Post-conviction petitioner was unaware of potential immigration consequences until he was placed in deportation proceedings, by which time the post-conviction statute of limitations had expired, and therefore the statute of limitations was tolled. Reversed and remanded. The court explained that, because neither the court nor defense counsel told petitioner of the possibility of immigration consequences, a reasonable layperson in petitioner's position would have had no reason to investigate or consult with counsel. The resulting rule is similar to the civil discovery rule for tolling a statute of limitations. Balmer dissented, arguing that petitioner had all the facts necessary to his claim. Balmer would have held that the petitioner's legal ignorance did not make his failure to seek counsel reasonable.

Gutale v. State 364 Or 502 (February 28, 2019) (Nelson) (Washington County, Bailey)

Oregon Supreme Court, September 12, 2013

by: Alex Flood and Abassos • September 12, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - September 11, 2013

by: Alarson and Abassos • September 11, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - September 5, 2013

by: Abassos • September 6, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - August 28, 2013

by: Abassos • August 28, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - August 21, 2013

by: Abassos • August 21, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Supreme Court - August 15, 2013

by: Jevans and Abassos • August 16, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - August 14, 2013

Oregon Appellate Court - August 7, 2013

by: Abassos • August 7, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - July 31, 2013

by: Zara Lukens, Alex Flood and Abassos • July 31, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Supreme Court - July 25, 2013

by: Zara Lukens and Abassos • July 25, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - July 17, 2013

by: Sonja Good Stefani, Zara Lukens and Abassos • July 17, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - July 24, 2013

by: Alarson, Sonja Good Stefani, Zara Lukens and Abassos • July 17, 2013 • no comments

United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit -- July 15, 2013

by: Alex Flood • July 17, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - July 10, 2013

by: Zara Lukens, Alarson, Sonja Good Stefani and Abassos • July 10, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Supreme Court - July 5, 2013

by: Sonja Good Stefani and Abassos • July 8, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - July 3, 2013

by: Alex Flood, Alarson and Abassos • July 8, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Supreme Court - June 27, 2013

by: Zara Lukens and Abassos • June 28, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - June 26, 2013

by: Alarson and Abassos • June 26, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Supreme Court - June 20, 2013

by: Sonja Good Stefani and Abassos • June 24, 2013 • no comments

Oregon Appellate Court - June 19, 2013

by: Zara Lukens, Sonja Good Stefani and Abassos • June 20, 2013 • no comments