Oregon Appellate Ct - Dec. 11, 2013
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Abassos • December 11, 2013 • no comments
(Created page with "<summary hidden> *Delinquency - Court May Not Order Youth to Pay for Psych Eval </summary> '''Delinquency - Court May Not Order Youth to Pay for Psych Eval''' Ordering youth...") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Ordering youth to pay for his own psychological evaluation was outside the court's dispositional authority under ORS 419C.446(2). Paying for a psych eval is not "of the same kind" as the other requirements listed in 419C.446(2) that a judge may impose. Per Curiam. Reversed. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A153160.pdf State v CMC], 259 Or App ___ (12/11/2013) | Ordering youth to pay for his own psychological evaluation was outside the court's dispositional authority under ORS 419C.446(2). Paying for a psych eval is not "of the same kind" as the other requirements listed in 419C.446(2) that a judge may impose. Per Curiam. Reversed. [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A153160.pdf State v CMC], 259 Or App ___ (12/11/2013) | ||
| + | {{wl-publish: 2013-12-11 09:20:53 -0800 | Abassos:Alex Bassos }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:20, December 12, 2013
Delinquency - Court May Not Order Youth to Pay for Psych Eval
Ordering youth to pay for his own psychological evaluation was outside the court's dispositional authority under ORS 419C.446(2). Paying for a psych eval is not "of the same kind" as the other requirements listed in 419C.446(2) that a judge may impose. Per Curiam. Reversed. State v CMC, 259 Or App ___ (12/11/2013)
