Other Crimes with Vertical Proportionality Problems
by: Ryan • June 14, 2011 • no comments
(Importing text file) |
m (Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison. | Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison. | ||
| − | {{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | + | {{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} |
Latest revision as of 12:06, August 10, 2013
The Simonson opinion said that Sex Abuse II, under a Stamper theory of conviction, presented "the textbook example of the principle of vertical proportionality."
What are other crimes that might have the same problem? See this blog post from February 3, 2011. It discusses the crimes of Online Sexual Corruption of a Minor and Possession of a Precursor Substance.
Another potential proportionality problem is created by Aggravated ID Theft. Assume your client is already subject to a repeat property sentence under ORS 137.717. For 2 ID Thefts, he could get 26 months (2 x 13) in prison (even without an upward departure). For 10 ID Thefts, he could be charged with Aggravated ID Theft and only get 19 months in prison.
