Oregon Appellate Court 06-08-11

Latest revision as of 17:21, December 21, 2012

Read the full article for details about the following new cases:

• Dependency - Child Endangerment - Child Pornography

Possession of child pornography is not sufficient in itself for a finding of child endangerment. The state did not make a sufficient showing that a threat of exposure to pornographic images is harmful enough to children to justify a finding of endangerment. In addition, the mere fact that the father possessed images of child pornography was not enough by itself to show that the father posed a harm to his children. In the Matter of T.F.