Oregon Appellate Court 06-08-11
From OCDLA Library of Defense
by: Abassos • June 7, 2011 • no comments
Read the full article for details about the following new cases:
- Dependency - Child Endangerment - Child Pornography
Possession of child pornography is not sufficient in itself for a finding of child endangerment. The state did not make a sufficient showing that a threat of exposure to pornographic images is harmful enough to children to justify a finding of endangerment. In addition, the mere fact that the father possessed images of child pornography was not enough by itself to show that the father posed a harm to his children. In the Matter of T.F.
