This is an important case because it revives Dominguez-Martinez -- which was a statutory stop analysis -- and makes that excellent case part of Art I, sec 9, jurisprudence. Including, I'd argue, the idea that traffic stops are supposed to be the "minimal intrusions on Oregon drivers." http://scholar.google.com/scholar?scidkt=17576227234042551485+17061941553322129545+12596814160424449777&as_sdt=2&hl=en
Comments
This is an important case because it revives Dominguez-Martinez -- which was a statutory stop analysis -- and makes that excellent case part of Art I, sec 9, jurisprudence. Including, I'd argue, the idea that traffic stops are supposed to be the "minimal intrusions on Oregon drivers." http://scholar.google.com/scholar?scidkt=17576227234042551485+17061941553322129545+12596814160424449777&as_sdt=2&hl=en