A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court - Nov. 6, 2013

From OCDLA Library of Defense
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Abassos • November 6, 2013 • one comment

Police Have an Obligation to Unambiguously End Traffic Stops

Where a police officer has physically blocked a person from leaving, the person is likely stopped, even if the officer tells the person they're free to leave. It is a totality of the circumstances test, but in this case, the physical barrier was the most important fact to the court. After the completion of a traffic stop, the officer had a casual conversation with the defendant in which he was clearly told he was free to leave. Defendant told the officer that the officer's car was blocking him in and the officer offered to immediately move it. Defendant did not bring it up again. The defendant, however, was not required to ask the officer to move his car: "the obligation to unambiguously end traffic stops does not fall on citizens; it falls on law enforcement officials." State v Peterson, 259 Or App ___ (11/6/2013)