UUW, Gun Minimum and Merger
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • July 25, 2001 • no comments
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction. | I have previously written two posts: [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_Felon_in_Possession_and_Unlawful_Use_of_a_Weapon:_Updated here] and [https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/Blog:Main/Merging_UUW_and_Felon_in_Possession:_Updated here] - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction. | ||
| − | Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation. | + | Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[file:gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc | Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation. |
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | ||
{{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} | {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:23, August 12, 2015
I have previously written two posts: here and here - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled Gun minimum, UUW and merger arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
