UUW, Gun Minimum and Merger
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • July 25, 2001 • no comments
(Importing text file) |
(Importing text file) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have previously written two posts ([http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/merging-uuw-and-felon-in-possession/ here] and [http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/merging-felon-in-possession-and-unlawful-use-of-a-weapon/ here]) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction. | I have previously written two posts ([http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/merging-uuw-and-felon-in-possession/ here] and [http://mpdtrainer.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/merging-felon-in-possession-and-unlawful-use-of-a-weapon/ here]) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction. | ||
| − | Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[ | + | Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [[http://libraryofdefense.org/sites/default/files/gun-minimum-uuw-and-merger1.doc Gun minimum, UUW and merger]] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation. |
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | ||
{{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | ||
Revision as of 19:06, December 21, 2012
I have previously written two posts (here and here) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [Gun minimum, UUW and merger] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
