UUW, Gun Minimum and Merger
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • July 25, 2001 • no comments
(Importing text file) |
m (Text replace - "| Ryan }}" to "| Ryan:Ryan Scott }}") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument. | ||
| − | {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | + | {{wl-publish: 2001-07-25 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} |
Revision as of 12:09, August 10, 2013
I have previously written two posts (here and here) - both subsequently updated - on merging Felon in Possession and UUW, when the former also alleges the gun minimum. The impact, ironically, is to leave your client with only a non-person conviction.
Though I laid out the analysis in those two posts, I did not include a memo. Well, here's a motion entitled [Gun minimum, UUW and merger] arguing for the merger of Burglary I and UUW, when the burglary count also includes the gun minimum allegation.
Enjoy! Please let me know the outcome if you make the argument.
