A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Suddenly Relevant and Significant Opinion . . . .from 1973

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main
Revision as of 12:38, April 1, 2016 by Ryan@ryanscottlaw.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Ryan • March 31, 2016 • no comments

If, however, a case goes to trial and the evidence establishes that the charges are not properly joined, then either: (1) the improperly joined charges should be dismissed at the defendant's motion so that they can be the basis of a separate, later trial, see, State v. Clipston, 3 Or. App. 313, 473 P.2d 682 (1970); or (2) if the jury has possibly been unduly influenced by the evidence received concerning the improperly joined charges, then the only remaining procedure is for the defendant to move for a mistrial.[3]


State v. Sanchez, 14 Or. App. 234, 511 P.2d 1231 (1973)