Special Jury Instruction for Commercial Drug Offenses (Includes Sample and Memo)
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • April 19, 2012 • no comments
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The answer varies, but I can tell you it's not "10." | The answer varies, but I can tell you it's not "10." | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Media:File.Cdo_sq_special_jury_instruction_public.pdf CDO-SQ Instruction]] |
{{wl-publish: 2012-04-19 16:28:58 -0700 | Ryan }} | {{wl-publish: 2012-04-19 16:28:58 -0700 | Ryan }} | ||
Revision as of 13:23, February 4, 2013
I have attached a special jury instruction for your use in CDO cases. I wrote it for a BM 57 drug case. The same logic may also apply to enhancement factors for burglary in the first degree and maybe even the gun minimum.
Very simple issue. How many jurors does it take to find those enhancements "not proven"?
The answer varies, but I can tell you it's not "10."
Media:File.Cdo_sq_special_jury_instruction_public.pdf CDO-SQ Instruction
