Simonson, Sex Abuse II and Sex Offender Registration
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • June 14, 2011 • no comments
(Importing text file) |
(Importing text file) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Just a reminder that as nice as ''[ | + | Just a reminder that as nice as ''[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A141269.htm Simonson ]''is, we still need to get [[Blog:Main/A_Shameful_Day_for_the_Court_of_Appeals_._._._and_Oregon | ''Stamper '']]overturned. A sex abuse II conviction based on ''Stamper ''still would [[Blog:Main/Is_it_possible_to_be_convicted_of_a_sex_crime_but_not_have_to_register_as_a_sex_offender%3F | require sex offender registration]] in situations where Rape III or Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor might not. |
{{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | {{wl-publish: 2011-06-14 21:00:00 -0700 | Ryan }} | ||
Revision as of 19:04, December 21, 2012
Just a reminder that as nice as Simonson is, we still need to get Stamper overturned. A sex abuse II conviction based on Stamper still would require sex offender registration in situations where Rape III or Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor might not.
