A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Right to "no adverse inference" instruction in enhancement trials?

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Ryan • April 13, 2013 • no comments

(Created page with "<summary>Defendants who don't testify during a trial are entitled to an instruction telling the jury that they should not draw an adverse inference from his decision not to te...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<summary>Defendants who don't testify during a trial are entitled to an instruction telling the jury that they should not draw an adverse inference from his decision not to testify.  Is the defendant entitled to the same instruction -- or a renewal of the instruction if already given during the culpability phase -- during an enhancement trial?</summary>
+
<summary>Defendants who don't testify during a trial are entitled to an instruction telling the jury that it should not draw an adverse inference from his decision not to testify.  Is the defendant entitled to the same instruction -- or a renewal of the instruction if already given during the culpability phase -- during an enhancement trial?</summary>
  
 
There's a [http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/white-v-woodall/ petition for cert] on this issue in the context of a capital case, where the defendant has pleaded guilty to the underlying offense and the aggravators.  Not a perfect analog to non-capital sentencing trials, but close enough that you should probably be asking for such an instruction if you aren't already.
 
There's a [http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/white-v-woodall/ petition for cert] on this issue in the context of a capital case, where the defendant has pleaded guilty to the underlying offense and the aggravators.  Not a perfect analog to non-capital sentencing trials, but close enough that you should probably be asking for such an instruction if you aren't already.
 
{{wl-publish: 2013-04-13 10:38:09 -0700 | Ryan }}
 
{{wl-publish: 2013-04-13 10:38:09 -0700 | Ryan }}

Revision as of 10:38, April 14, 2013

Defendants who don't testify during a trial are entitled to an instruction telling the jury that it should not draw an adverse inference from his decision not to testify. Is the defendant entitled to the same instruction -- or a renewal of the instruction if already given during the culpability phase -- during an enhancement trial?

There's a petition for cert on this issue in the context of a capital case, where the defendant has pleaded guilty to the underlying offense and the aggravators. Not a perfect analog to non-capital sentencing trials, but close enough that you should probably be asking for such an instruction if you aren't already.