A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Court - March 15, 2018

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Rankin Johnson • March 16, 2018 • no comments

(Created page with "<summary hidden> '''<big>Judicial Fitness</big>''' </summary> '''Written by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' <br /> '''<big>Judicial Fitness</big>''' The record showed, by cle...")
 

Latest revision as of 21:24, March 17, 2018

Written by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

Judicial Fitness

The record showed, by clear and convincing evidence, that respondent, a circuit court judge, had engaged in willful misconduct. He was suspended without pay for three years. The court made a lengthy analysis of a complex set of facts and concluded that respondent had engaged in misconduct in several particulars. The court also made findings about the procedural requirements for judicial discipline cases, and repeatedly cited lawyer discipline cases, which are based on a similar statutory framework.

In Re Day 362 Or 547 (2018) (Per curiam)