A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court--December 27, 2018

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

by: Rankin Johnson • January 8, 2019 • no comments

(Created page with "<summary hidden> FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay </summary> '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' '''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay''' Evidence that def...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<summary hidden>
 
<summary hidden>
 
FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay
 
FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay
 +
APPEAL AND REVIEW - Proceedings on remand
 +
SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety
 
</summary>
 
</summary>
 
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA'''
 
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA'''
Line 14: Line 16:
 
When Court of Appeals remanded for PCR court to reconsider prejudice ruling, PCR court erred by also considering whether counsel had been ineffective. Reversed and remanded.  
 
When Court of Appeals remanded for PCR court to reconsider prejudice ruling, PCR court erred by also considering whether counsel had been ineffective. Reversed and remanded.  
  
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto Maxfield v. Cain]  295 Or App 553 (January 3, 2019) (Powers) (Malheur County, Guimond)
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21961/download#page=1&zoom=auto Maxfield v. Cain]  295 Or App 553 (January 3, 2019) (Powers) (Malheur County, Guimond)
  
 
'''SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety'''
 
'''SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety'''
Line 21: Line 23:
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21969/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Nye]  295 Or App 559 (January 3, 2019) (Garrett) (Klamath County, Adkisson)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21969/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Nye]  295 Or App 559 (January 3, 2019) (Garrett) (Klamath County, Adkisson)
 
+
{{wl-publish: 2019-01-08 14:19:48 -0800 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin Johnson IV }}
'''X, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness] 295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+
 
+
'''FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay'''
+
 
+
Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21959/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Lyness]  295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)
+

Latest revision as of 15:19, January 9, 2019

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

FINES, FEES, AND COSTS - Ability to pay

Evidence that defendant had previously worked did not support a finding that he could afford to pay $1,737 in court-appointed attorney fees while serving a 70-month prison term. Reversed.

State v. Lyness 295 Or App 524 (January 3, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, Prall)

APPEAL AND REVIEW - Proceedings on remand

When Court of Appeals remanded for PCR court to reconsider prejudice ruling, PCR court erred by also considering whether counsel had been ineffective. Reversed and remanded.

Maxfield v. Cain 295 Or App 553 (January 3, 2019) (Powers) (Malheur County, Guimond)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety

Defendant's furtive movements and agitated demeanor during a traffic stop did not provide a basis for a nonvoluntary officer-safety patdown. Reversed and remanded.

State v. Nye 295 Or App 559 (January 3, 2019) (Garrett) (Klamath County, Adkisson)