Is Your Smart TV Spying on You? And How This Relates to the Most Important Suppression Opinion of the Year
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan Scott • February 7, 2017 • no comments
(Created page with "<summary>The Fourth Amendment blog writes about the story [http://fourthamendment.com/?p=25693 here]. The blog post asks the question: "So, if this is third party data, is i...") |
Revision as of 12:31, February 8, 2017
The Fourth Amendment blog writes about the story here.
The blog post asks the question: "So, if this is third party data, is it subject to mere subpoena and not a search warrant?"
And the answer is: NOT IN OREGON, BABY! See [State v. Ghim], the most important suppression opinion of 2017.
