Important case regarding additional testing of item lawfully seized (but without a search warrant)
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan Scott • September 20, 2017 • no comments
(Created page with "The case is [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A146025A.pdf ''State v. Sines.''] It is a significant, thorough opinion on a particularly complicated search and se...") |
Latest revision as of 09:42, September 21, 2017
The case is State v. Sines. It is a significant, thorough opinion on a particularly complicated search and seizure issue.
This opinion is almost certainly helpful in cases where the police lawfully seize a firearm without a warrant (during a traffic stop, for example) and then do an arguably unlawful ballistics test, also without a search warrant. The facts in Sines are much, much different, but the analysis would be similar.
