Are There Some Theories of Aggravated Murder an Accomplice Can't Be Guilty Of?
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Main(Difference between revisions)
This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.
by: Ryan • May 5, 2016 • no comments
(Created page with "Yes, I think so. Today's [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S059155.pdf Turnidge] decision emphasized that at least some aggravated factors -- and perhaps all -- a...") |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This is one of the consequences of the [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S059045.pdf ''Lopez-Minjarez''] decision, which attorneys still aren't taking full advantage of. | This is one of the consequences of the [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S059045.pdf ''Lopez-Minjarez''] decision, which attorneys still aren't taking full advantage of. | ||
− | Let me know if you need my materials on the topic. | + | Let me know if you need my materials on the topic and I'll see if I can dig them up but in the meantime, see [http://Blog:Main/Are_there_some_crimes_you_can't_legally_be_an_accomplice_to%3F this post]. |
{{wl-publish: 2016-05-05 15:31:08 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} | {{wl-publish: 2016-05-05 15:31:08 -0700 | Ryan:Ryan Scott }} |
Latest revision as of 15:35, May 6, 2016
Yes, I think so. Today's Turnidge decision emphasized that at least some aggravated factors -- and perhaps all -- are "circumstances."
I have long argued that accomplices can't be guilty of crimes that require a circumstance. Often, they can only be guilty of lesser offenses which don't include the circumstance.
This is one of the consequences of the Lopez-Minjarez decision, which attorneys still aren't taking full advantage of.
Let me know if you need my materials on the topic and I'll see if I can dig them up but in the meantime, see this post.