Oregon Supreme Ct - Sept 15, 2016
by: Sara Werboff • September 18, 2016 • no comments
(Created page with "<summary hidden> *First-Degree Child Neglect Does Not Include Leaving a Child Where Drugs are Possessed with Intent to Deliver </summary> '''First-Degree Child Neglect Does N...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''First-Degree Child Neglect Does Not Include Leaving a Child Where Drugs are Possessed with Intent to Deliver''' | '''First-Degree Child Neglect Does Not Include Leaving a Child Where Drugs are Possessed with Intent to Deliver''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Supreme Court analyzes the legislative history of the first-degree child neglect statute, providing that a person commits that crime by allowing children to be present in a place where drugs "are being delivered," and concludes that evidence only of possession with intent to distribute is not sufficient to convict. In this case, defendant was stopped for a traffic violation with three children in the car. Defendant admitted to possessing drugs for sale, and police later found them. Defendant was charged with numerous drug offenses, including first-degree child neglect. After determining that the text and context (including the ''Boyd'' decision from the Court of Appeals) did not resolve the issue, the court exhaustively examined the legislative history. | ||
Revision as of 09:17, September 19, 2016
First-Degree Child Neglect Does Not Include Leaving a Child Where Drugs are Possessed with Intent to Deliver
The Supreme Court analyzes the legislative history of the first-degree child neglect statute, providing that a person commits that crime by allowing children to be present in a place where drugs "are being delivered," and concludes that evidence only of possession with intent to distribute is not sufficient to convict. In this case, defendant was stopped for a traffic violation with three children in the car. Defendant admitted to possessing drugs for sale, and police later found them. Defendant was charged with numerous drug offenses, including first-degree child neglect. After determining that the text and context (including the Boyd decision from the Court of Appeals) did not resolve the issue, the court exhaustively examined the legislative history.
