Oregon Supreme Ct - Nov 25, 2016
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Sara Werboff • November 25, 2016 • no comments
(Created page with "<summary hidden> * </summary> [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063612.pdf State v. Gerhardt], 360 Or 629 (2016) (Landau, J.)") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<summary hidden> | <summary hidden> | ||
| − | * | + | *Restitution - Restitution Award Proper When Defendant's Crime Was the But-For Cause of Victim's Attorney Fees and Fees Were a Foreseeable Result |
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| + | '''Restitution - Restitution Award Proper When Defendant's Crime Was the But-For Cause of Victim's Attorney Fees and Fees Were a Foreseeable Result''' | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063612.pdf State v. Gerhardt], 360 Or 629 (2016) (Landau, J.) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/S063612.pdf State v. Gerhardt], 360 Or 629 (2016) (Landau, J.) | ||
Revision as of 13:45, November 26, 2016
Restitution - Restitution Award Proper When Defendant's Crime Was the But-For Cause of Victim's Attorney Fees and Fees Were a Foreseeable Result
State v. Gerhardt, 360 Or 629 (2016) (Landau, J.)
