Oregon Supreme Court, November 7, 2019
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 07:28, November 9, 2019 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)
by: Rankin Johnson • November 8, 2019 • no comments
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
POST-PRISON SUPERVISION — Permissible conditions
PPS condition prohibiting intimate relationships without permission exceeded Board's statutory authority. Reversed.
Although the case was moot, a statute permitted review when a policy of a public body is contrary to law. The court decided the case on statutory grounds, and thus did not reach constitutional issues.
Penn v. Board of Parole and PPS 365 Or 607 (October 24, 2019) (Nakamoto) (Board of Parole and PPS)
