A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Court, August 28, 2020

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 13:04, August 29, 2020 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • August 28, 2020 • no comments

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION - Conduct or circumstance elements

In order to be convicted of sexual abuse in the second degree, defendant must act knowingly with respect to the victim's lack of consent. Reversed.

Relying on ordinary statutory construction, the court explained that the victim's lack of consent was a conduct element requiring a knowing mental state, rather than a circumstance element permitting a less culpable mental state. Although the court discussed legislative history at length, it found that the history was contradictory and unilluminating.

State v. Haltom 366 Or 791 (August 28, 2020) (Nelson) (Yamihll County, Wiles)