Oregon Supreme Court, April 8, 2021
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Rankin Johnson • April 8, 2021 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> TRIAL PROCEDURE - New trial motions </summary> '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' '''TRIAL PROCEDURE - Timeliness of filing''' A timely motion, r...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<summary hidden> | <summary hidden> | ||
| − | TRIAL PROCEDURE - | + | TRIAL PROCEDURE - Timeliness of filing |
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''TRIAL PROCEDURE - Timeliness of filing''' | '''TRIAL PROCEDURE - Timeliness of filing''' | ||
| − | + | An otherwise-timely motion, rejected for lack of a filing fee, is timely filed if the fee is paid within a three-day grace period. | |
| + | |||
| + | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/S067165 Otnes v. PCC Structurals] 367 Or 788 (March 17, 2021) (Nelson) (Multnomah County, Wittmayer) | ||
| + | {{wl-publish: 2021-04-08 11:36:05 -0700 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin Johnson }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:36, April 9, 2021
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
TRIAL PROCEDURE - Timeliness of filing
An otherwise-timely motion, rejected for lack of a filing fee, is timely filed if the fee is paid within a three-day grace period.
Otnes v. PCC Structurals 367 Or 788 (March 17, 2021) (Nelson) (Multnomah County, Wittmayer)
