Oregon Appellate Ct - Sept 28, 2016
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Sara Werboff • September 30, 2016 • no comments
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<summary hidden> | <summary hidden> | ||
* | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Insufficiency of Evidence for Failure to Report as a Sex Offender | ||
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 27: | ||
| + | '''Per Curiam - Insufficiency of Evidence for Failure to Report as a Sex Offender''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The court accepts the state's concession that there was insufficient evidence to convict defendant of failure to report as a sex offender in light of ''State v. Hiner'', 269 Or App 877 (2015). | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A159208.pdf State v. McColligan], 281 Or App 375 (2016) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A159208.pdf State v. McColligan], 281 Or App 375 (2016) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 07:18, October 1, 2016
State v. Snyder, 281 Or App 308 (2016) (Sercombe, P.J)
State v. Webber, 281 Or App 342 (2016) (DeHoog, J.)
State v. Middleton, 281 Or App 369 (2016) (per curiam)
State v. Jonas, 281 Or App 372 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Insufficiency of Evidence for Failure to Report as a Sex Offender
The court accepts the state's concession that there was insufficient evidence to convict defendant of failure to report as a sex offender in light of State v. Hiner, 269 Or App 877 (2015).
State v. McColligan, 281 Or App 375 (2016) (per curiam)
