Oregon Appellate Ct - Oct 19, 2016
by: Sara Werboff • October 21, 2016 • no comments
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| − | Juvenile Delinquency - | + | Juvenile Delinquency - Court is Required to Make Specific Findings Why Out-of-Home Placement is Necessary |
| + | |||
| + | The court concludes that the juvenile court is required by ORS 419C.626(3)(a) to make specific findings as to why continued out-of-home placement is necessary, and here, the juvenile court's findings were sufficient. | ||
Revision as of 06:46, October 21, 2016
Vindictive Sentencing
State v. Bradley, 281 Or App 696 (2016) (Tookey, J.)
Burglary
State v. Gordon, 281 Or App 654 (2016) (Armstrong, P.J.)
Compensatory Fine
State v. Nichols, 281 Or App 658 (2016) (Sercombe, P.J.)
Denial of Continuance -
State v. Stull, 281 Or App 662 (2016) (Egan, J.)
Plea Agreements -
State v. Thomas, 281 Or App 685 (2016) (Devore, J.)
Civil Commitment -
State v. S.R.J., 281 Or App 741 (2016) (Flynn, J.) (Lagesen, J., dissenting)
Juvenile Dependency -
DHS v. S.M.S., 281 Or App 720 (2016) (Garrett, J.)
Search & Seizure -
State v. Delfino, 281 Or App 725 (2016) (Flynn, J.)
Juvenile Delinquency - Court is Required to Make Specific Findings Why Out-of-Home Placement is Necessary
The court concludes that the juvenile court is required by ORS 419C.626(3)(a) to make specific findings as to why continued out-of-home placement is necessary, and here, the juvenile court's findings were sufficient.
State v. D.J., 281 Or App 730 (2016) (Flynn, J.)
Per Curiam - Error to Impose Restitution and Suspend SNAP Benefits
In this prosecution for unlawfully disposing of food stamp benefits and theft, the state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing $818.53 in restitution when the record supported an award of only $150.77. Additionally, the state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a lifetime suspension of SNAP benefits because that ruling was based on the trial court's erroneous determination of the restitution amount as over $500.
State v. Keller, 281 Or App 774 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Sentence Exceeded Statutory Maximum
The trial court sentenced defendant to 75 months in prison and 120 months post-prison supervision for first-degree sex abuse. Because the maximum term for that offense, including both incarceration and PPS, cannot exceed 120 months, the trial court erred.
State v. Evans, 281 Or App 771 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Reversing Mandatory State Amt and Affirming Attorney Fee Judgment
There was no statutory authority for the trial court to impose a $60 "Mandatory State Amt." The court affirms the attorney fee award because the trial court did not commit plain error. There was evidence that defendant possessed assets and had only a jail sentence.
State v. Stier, 281 Or App 768 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fee Judgment
The court concludes that the trial court plainly erred in imposing $460 in attorney fees because there was no evidence in the record that defendant had the ability to pay and it would significantly burden a person without means, especially in light of the other $1,500 in fines that defendant owed.
State v. Hollamon, 281 Or App 766 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fee Judgment
Because defendant was sentenced to a lengthy prison term and there was no evidence that he had financial resources, the court concludes the trial court plainly erred in imposing $6,000 in attorney fees and the court grants its discretion to correct the error.
State v. Maipi, 281 Or App 764 (2016) (per curiam)
