Oregon Appellate Ct - Nov 9, 2016
by: Sara Werboff • November 11, 2016 • no comments
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Civil Commitment - Appellant Was Not a Danger to Others and Could Provide Basic Needs | *Civil Commitment - Appellant Was Not a Danger to Others and Could Provide Basic Needs | ||
* | * | ||
| − | * | + | *Juvenile Dependency - Record Below Insufficient to Support Jurisdiction |
| − | * | + | *Termination of Parental Rights - Mother's Inadequate Assistance of Counsel Claim Fails |
*Post-Conviction Relief - PCR Court Did Not Make Sufficient Findings In the Judgment | *Post-Conviction Relief - PCR Court Did Not Make Sufficient Findings In the Judgment | ||
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
| − | Juvenile | + | '''Juvenile Dependency - Record Below Insufficient to Support Jurisdiction''' |
| + | |||
| + | The court accepts the state's concession that the record below was insufficient to establish that there was a current risk of harm to the children. DHS asserted two bases for jurisdiction, one of which was dismissed by the juvenile court. The other, that parents used to manufacture marijuana, DHS concedes did not create a current risk of harm. | ||
| Line 115: | Line 117: | ||
| − | + | '''Termination of Parental Rights - Mother's Inadequate Assistance of Counsel Claim Fails''' | |
| + | |||
| + | The court rejects mother's claim that her attorney provided inadequate assistance at mother's termination of parental rights trial by failing to mount a defense. Mother failed to appear at the trial. Because mother was absent, her attorney was precluded by ORS 419B.815(8) from participating in the trial on her behalf. | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161860.pdf DHS v. K.L.H.] 281 Or App 203 (2016) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161860.pdf DHS v. K.L.H.] 281 Or App 203 (2016) (per curiam) | ||
| Line 123: | Line 127: | ||
'''Post-Conviction Relief - PCR Court Did Not Make Sufficient Findings In the Judgment''' | '''Post-Conviction Relief - PCR Court Did Not Make Sufficient Findings In the Judgment''' | ||
| − | The court reverses and remands a PCR judgment so that the PCR court can make findings as required by ORS 138.640(1) with respect to one of petitioner's claims. The PCR is required to supply the basis for denying a PCR claim in the judgment. | + | The court reverses and remands a PCR judgment so that the PCR court can make findings as required by ORS 138.640(1) with respect to one of petitioner's claims. The PCR court is required to supply the basis for denying a PCR claim in the judgment. |
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A158351.pdf Walls v. Nooth], 281 Or App 205 (2016) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A158351.pdf Walls v. Nooth], 281 Or App 205 (2016) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 15:17, November 12, 2016
Burglary - Identity Theft - Defendant Entitled to MJOA for Failure to Prove Trespass for Burglary and State Failed to Prove Venue for ID Theft
State v. Berndt, 281 Or App 73 (2016) (Armstrong, P.J)
Jury Instructions - Instruction on Forcible Compulsion was Plain Error but Did Not Warrant Reversal
State v. Waldbillig, 281 Or App 84 (2016) (Ortega, P.J.)
Vindictive Sentencing - Sentence Vindictive When Trial Court Imposed Harsher Sentence for Exercising Right to Trial
State v. Robledo, 281 Or App 96 (2016) (Egan, J.)
Appeal and Review - Court Had Jurisdiction Over Appeal But Claim Was Unreviewable
State v. Silsby, 281 Or App 104 (2016) (Lagesen, P.J.)
Post-Conviction Relief - Counsel Not Ineffective for Failing to Let Petitioner Plea to Misdemeanor
Eby v. Premo, 281 Or App 114 (2016) (Lagesen, P.J.)
Pro Se Defendant Did Not Validly Waive by Misconduct his Right to Representation
State v. Lacey, 281 Or App 123 (2016) (Lagesen, J.) (Garrett, J., dissenting)
Vindictive Sentencing - Double Jeopardy - Vouching Issues - Remanding for Resentencing but Otherwise Affirming Convictions
State v. Criswell, 281 Or App 146 (2016) (Garrett, J.)
Vouching - Miranda - Detective's Statements to Defendant During Interrogation Were Not Vouching and No Miranda Violation for Statements Made to DHS
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A153009.pdf State v. Codon, 281 Or App 165 (2016) (Garrett, J.)
Civil Commitment - Appellant Was Not a Danger to Others and Could Provide Basic Needs
State v. S.P. 281 Or App 177 (2016) (Garrett, J.)
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fee Award
State v. Hagstrom, 281 Or App 188 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Evidence Legally Insufficient for Civil Commitment
State v. R.P.P., 281 Or App 190 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Under Previous Version of Civil Commitment Statute Evidence is Legally Insufficient
State v. S.L., 281 Or App 192 (2016) (per curiam)
State v. J.L., 281 Or App 195 (2016) (per curiam)
State v. C.F.-S., 281 Or App 198 (2016) (per curiam)
Juvenile Dependency - Record Below Insufficient to Support Jurisdiction
The court accepts the state's concession that the record below was insufficient to establish that there was a current risk of harm to the children. DHS asserted two bases for jurisdiction, one of which was dismissed by the juvenile court. The other, that parents used to manufacture marijuana, DHS concedes did not create a current risk of harm.
DHS v. P.R.H., 281 Or App 201 (2016) (per curiam)
Termination of Parental Rights - Mother's Inadequate Assistance of Counsel Claim Fails
The court rejects mother's claim that her attorney provided inadequate assistance at mother's termination of parental rights trial by failing to mount a defense. Mother failed to appear at the trial. Because mother was absent, her attorney was precluded by ORS 419B.815(8) from participating in the trial on her behalf.
DHS v. K.L.H. 281 Or App 203 (2016) (per curiam)
Post-Conviction Relief - PCR Court Did Not Make Sufficient Findings In the Judgment
The court reverses and remands a PCR judgment so that the PCR court can make findings as required by ORS 138.640(1) with respect to one of petitioner's claims. The PCR court is required to supply the basis for denying a PCR claim in the judgment.
Walls v. Nooth, 281 Or App 205 (2016) (per curiam)
