A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Ct - Nov 16, 2016

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Sara Werboff • November 18, 2016 • no comments

Line 5: Line 5:
 
*
 
*
 
*
 
*
*
+
*Search & Seizure - Officer Unlawfully Extended Stop Without Reasonable Suspicion
 
*Per Curiam - Disorderly Conduct - Defendant Entitled to Acquittal for Failure to Prove he Created a Public Risk
 
*Per Curiam - Disorderly Conduct - Defendant Entitled to Acquittal for Failure to Prove he Created a Public Risk
 
*Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Trial Court Failed to Advise Appellant of his Rights
 
*Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Trial Court Failed to Advise Appellant of his Rights
Line 30: Line 30:
  
  
Search & Seizure - Officer Unlawfully Extended Stop Without Reasonable Suspicion
+
'''Search & Seizure - Officer Unlawfully Extended Stop Without Reasonable Suspicion'''
  
  

Revision as of 20:14, November 18, 2016


State v. Dulfu, 282 Or App 209 (2016) (Hadlock, C.J.)


Ha v. Board of Parole, 282 Or App 227 (2016) (Hadlock, C.J.)


State v. Jenkins, 282 Or App 276 (2016) (Devore, J.)


State v. Tate, 282 Or App 320 (2016) (Tookey, J.)


State v. Edwards, 282 Or App 328 (2016) (Tookey, J.)


Search & Seizure - Officer Unlawfully Extended Stop Without Reasonable Suspicion


State v. Dawson, 282 Or App 335 (2016) (Flynn, J.)


Per Curiam - Disorderly Conduct - Defendant Entitled to Acquittal for Failure to Prove he Created a Public Risk

The court holds that the state failed to prevent sufficient evidence that defendant created a risk of public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm. Defendant was charged with second-degree disorderly conduct after he got into an altercation with a taxi driver. There was no evidence that anyone other than the taxi driver or the police officers responding to the incident would have been aware of defendant's conduct. The state concedes that it failed to prove that defendant's actions affected the public.

State v. Schell, 282 Or App 364 (2016) (per curiam)


Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Trial Court Failed to Advise Appellant of his Rights

The court reverses an order civilly committing appellant because the trial court failed to advise appellant of his rights listed in ORS 426.100(1).

State v. P.H.D., 282 Or App 367 (2016) (per curiam)