Oregon Appellate Ct - Feb 23, 2017
by: Sara Werboff • February 27, 2017 • no comments
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Trial Court Did Not Plainly Err in Imposing Attorney Fees | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Defendant's Father Lacked Actual Authority to Consent to Search of Defendant's Room | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Insufficient Evidence to Support Civil Commitment | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Defendant's Two Unlawful Delivery Guilty Verdicts Should Merge | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Juvenile Dependency Appeal Dismissed as Moot | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Rejecting Challenge to Auto Exception Search | ||
| + | *Per Curiam - Court Grants Reconsider to Correct Citation Error | ||
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| − | |||
| + | '''Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The court concludes that the trial court erred in imposing attorney fees after explicitly finding on the record that defendant did not have the ability to pay. | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A159255.pdf State v. Clark], 283 Or App 893 (2017) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A159255.pdf State v. Clark], 283 Or App 893 (2017) (per curiam) | ||
| Line 14: | Line 31: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Trial Court Did Not Plainly Err in Imposing Attorney Fees | + | '''Per Curiam - Trial Court Did Not Plainly Err in Imposing Attorney Fees''' |
The court concludes that the trial court did not plainly err in imposing $416 in attorney fees because there was evidence in the record that defendant was receiving disability payments. | The court concludes that the trial court did not plainly err in imposing $416 in attorney fees because there was evidence in the record that defendant was receiving disability payments. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 39: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Defendant's Father Lacked Actual Authority to Consent to Search of Defendant's Room | + | '''Per Curiam - Defendant's Father Lacked Actual Authority to Consent to Search of Defendant's Room''' |
The court accepts the state's concession that evidence derived from a search of defendant's room should have been suppressed. Defendant rented a room from his father. Defendant's father consented to a search of defendant's room but defendant indicated he did not give his consent. Under those circumstances, the search was unlawful. | The court accepts the state's concession that evidence derived from a search of defendant's room should have been suppressed. Defendant rented a room from his father. Defendant's father consented to a search of defendant's room but defendant indicated he did not give his consent. Under those circumstances, the search was unlawful. | ||
| Line 30: | Line 47: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Insufficient Evidence to Support Civil Commitment | + | '''Per Curiam - Insufficient Evidence to Support Civil Commitment''' |
The court accepts the state's concession that there was legally insufficient evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that appellant was a danger to himself or others. | The court accepts the state's concession that there was legally insufficient evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that appellant was a danger to himself or others. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 55: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees | + | '''Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees''' |
The court accepts the state's concession that the trial court plainly erred in imposing $3,095 in attorney fees when the record was silent as to defendant's ability to pay the fees. | The court accepts the state's concession that the trial court plainly erred in imposing $3,095 in attorney fees when the record was silent as to defendant's ability to pay the fees. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 63: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Defendant's Two Unlawful Delivery Guilty Verdicts Should Merge | + | '''Per Curiam - Defendant's Two Unlawful Delivery Guilty Verdicts Should Merge''' |
The court concludes that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to merge the guilty verdicts for unlawful delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and unlawful delivery of cocaine. | The court concludes that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to merge the guilty verdicts for unlawful delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and unlawful delivery of cocaine. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 71: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees | + | '''Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees''' |
The court reverses the attorney fee award because the trial court did not announce it was imposing attorney fees at sentencing and defendant had no practical opportunity to object. | The court reverses the attorney fee award because the trial court did not announce it was imposing attorney fees at sentencing and defendant had no practical opportunity to object. | ||
| Line 62: | Line 79: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Juvenile Dependency Appeal Dismissed as Moot | + | '''Per Curiam - Juvenile Dependency Appeal Dismissed as Moot''' |
The court dismisses this juvenile dependency appeal as moot because the juvenile court dismissed jurisdiction over mother's child. | The court dismisses this juvenile dependency appeal as moot because the juvenile court dismissed jurisdiction over mother's child. | ||
| Line 70: | Line 87: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Rejecting Challenge to Auto Exception Search | + | '''Per Curiam - Rejecting Challenge to Auto Exception Search''' |
In light of State v. Bliss, decided today, the court rejects an identical argument made by defendant that police could not rely on automobile exception after stopping defendant for a traffic violation. | In light of State v. Bliss, decided today, the court rejects an identical argument made by defendant that police could not rely on automobile exception after stopping defendant for a traffic violation. | ||
| Line 78: | Line 95: | ||
| − | Per Curiam - Court Grants Reconsider to Correct Citation Error | + | '''Per Curiam - Court Grants Reconsider to Correct Citation Error''' |
The court grants reconsideration to correct an error in its original opinion. The court mistakenly stated that ORS 419B.815(8) precluded mother from arguing that her counsel was ineffective in a termination proceeding because she failed to appear at that hearing, when really the identically-worded ORS 419B.819(8) applies in termination proceedings. | The court grants reconsideration to correct an error in its original opinion. The court mistakenly stated that ORS 419B.815(8) precluded mother from arguing that her counsel was ineffective in a termination proceeding because she failed to appear at that hearing, when really the identically-worded ORS 419B.819(8) applies in termination proceedings. | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161860A.pdf DHS v. M.L.B.], 283 Or App 911 (2017) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161860A.pdf DHS v. M.L.B.], 283 Or App 911 (2017) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 10:16, February 28, 2017
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees
The court concludes that the trial court erred in imposing attorney fees after explicitly finding on the record that defendant did not have the ability to pay.
State v. Clark, 283 Or App 893 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Trial Court Did Not Plainly Err in Imposing Attorney Fees
The court concludes that the trial court did not plainly err in imposing $416 in attorney fees because there was evidence in the record that defendant was receiving disability payments.
State v. Poston, 283 Or App 895 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Defendant's Father Lacked Actual Authority to Consent to Search of Defendant's Room
The court accepts the state's concession that evidence derived from a search of defendant's room should have been suppressed. Defendant rented a room from his father. Defendant's father consented to a search of defendant's room but defendant indicated he did not give his consent. Under those circumstances, the search was unlawful.
State v. Fraser, 283 Or App 897 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Insufficient Evidence to Support Civil Commitment
The court accepts the state's concession that there was legally insufficient evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that appellant was a danger to himself or others.
State v. D.J., 283 Or App 899 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees
The court accepts the state's concession that the trial court plainly erred in imposing $3,095 in attorney fees when the record was silent as to defendant's ability to pay the fees.
State v. Cason, 283 Or App 901 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Defendant's Two Unlawful Delivery Guilty Verdicts Should Merge
The court concludes that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to merge the guilty verdicts for unlawful delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school and unlawful delivery of cocaine.
State v. Abraham, 283 Or App 903 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Reversing Attorney Fees
The court reverses the attorney fee award because the trial court did not announce it was imposing attorney fees at sentencing and defendant had no practical opportunity to object.
State v. Terhune, 283 Or App 905 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Juvenile Dependency Appeal Dismissed as Moot
The court dismisses this juvenile dependency appeal as moot because the juvenile court dismissed jurisdiction over mother's child.
DHS v. A.B., 283 Or App 907 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Rejecting Challenge to Auto Exception Search
In light of State v. Bliss, decided today, the court rejects an identical argument made by defendant that police could not rely on automobile exception after stopping defendant for a traffic violation.
State v. Kline, 283 Or App 909 (2017) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Court Grants Reconsider to Correct Citation Error
The court grants reconsideration to correct an error in its original opinion. The court mistakenly stated that ORS 419B.815(8) precluded mother from arguing that her counsel was ineffective in a termination proceeding because she failed to appear at that hearing, when really the identically-worded ORS 419B.819(8) applies in termination proceedings.
DHS v. M.L.B., 283 Or App 911 (2017) (per curiam)
