Oregon Appellate Ct - Dec 29, 2016
by: Sara Werboff • January 2, 2017 • no comments
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
| − | * | + | *Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Dismissal Required When Hearing was Untimely |
*Per Curiam - Affirming Probation Revocation Sentence Imposed Pursuant to Stipulation in Plea Agreement | *Per Curiam - Affirming Probation Revocation Sentence Imposed Pursuant to Stipulation in Plea Agreement | ||
</summary> | </summary> | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| + | '''Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Dismissal Required When Hearing was Untimely''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The court concludes that the trial court was required to dismiss the civil commitment proceedings against appellant because the hearing was not held within five judicial days after he was taken in for involuntary treatment. | ||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161457.pdf State v. E.R.], 283 Or App 282 (2016) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A161457.pdf State v. E.R.], 283 Or App 282 (2016) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 17:42, January 3, 2017
State v. Greene, 283 Or App 120 (2016) (Armstrong, P.J.)
State v. Alcantar, 283 Or App 114 (2016) (Hadlock, C.J.)
State v. Alegre, 283 Or App 127 (2016) (Ortega, P.J.)
State v. Landon, 283 Or App 131 (2016) (Ortega, P.J.)
DHS v. S.S., 283 Or App 136 (2016) (Ortega, P.J.)
State v. Herfurth, 283 Or App 149 (2016) (Duncan, P.J.)
State v. Wright, 283 Or App 160 (2016) (Duncan, P.J.)
Denton v. Nooth, 283 Or App 179 (2016) (Duncan, P.J.)
State v. Avila, 283 Or App 262 (2016) (Garrett, J.)
Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Dismissal Required When Hearing was Untimely
The court concludes that the trial court was required to dismiss the civil commitment proceedings against appellant because the hearing was not held within five judicial days after he was taken in for involuntary treatment.
State v. E.R., 283 Or App 282 (2016) (per curiam)
Per Curiam - Affirming Probation Revocation Sentence Imposed Pursuant to Stipulation in Plea Agreement
The court concludes that the sentence imposed on revocation of probation pursuant to a stipulation that defendant made in his plea agreement was unreviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(d).
State v. Keeler, 283 Or App 284 (2016) (per curiam)
