A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court - May 1, 2013

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 16:03, August 18, 2013 by Abassos@mpdlaw.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Jwestover and Abassos • May 1, 2013 • no comments

Transferred Inmate Must Show Previous Institution's Continued Influence in Order to Avoid Mootness

A case becomes moot if an decision would "fail[] to have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy." Here, a habeas petitioner alleged that by discontinuing his Ritalin prescription, the Oregon State Penitentiary was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. Prior to an ultimate disposition, however, petitioner was transferred to a Connecticut prison. Because the petitioner "has failed to present evidence that Oregon prison officials affect his treatment in Connecticut," the court finds that the case is moot. Davenport v. Premo, 256 Or App ___ (May 1, 2013).