Oregon Appellate Court - Jan 10, 2018
by: Msofia@ocdla.org • January 19, 2018 • no comments
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
'''Criminal Procedure--Right to Self-Representation''' | '''Criminal Procedure--Right to Self-Representation''' | ||
| − | + | The trial court erred in denying defendant the right to self-representation because it determined that defendant had insufficient reasons for wanting to represent himself. The trial court did not engage in a colloquy to determine whether defendant could knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and the record was insufficient for review. | |
| + | |||
[http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A162339.pdf State v. Muhammad], 289 Or App 816 (2018) (per curiam) | [http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A162339.pdf State v. Muhammad], 289 Or App 816 (2018) (per curiam) | ||
Revision as of 22:16, January 16, 2018
Summarized by Sara Werboff, OPDS | Edited by Mary Sofia, OCDLA
SEARCH & SEIZURE
Motion to Suppress—
State v. Burnham, 289 Or App 783 (2018) (Garrett, J.)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Criminal Procedure--Right to Self-Representation
The trial court erred in denying defendant the right to self-representation because it determined that defendant had insufficient reasons for wanting to represent himself. The trial court did not engage in a colloquy to determine whether defendant could knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and the record was insufficient for review.
State v. Muhammad, 289 Or App 816 (2018) (per curiam)
SENTENCING
Sentencing—Attorney Fees
The court holds that the trial court erred by imposing attorney fees without first determining defendant's ability to pay.
State v. Davis, 289 Or App 819 (2018) (per curiam)
