A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court--December 5, 2018

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • December 14, 2018 • no comments

(Created page with "<summary hidden> SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety EVIDENCE - 403 Balancing POST-CONVICTION - Bases for relief EVIDENCE - Hearsay SENTENCING - Restitution EXPUNCTION - Expun...")
 
Line 20: Line 20:
 
Officer had a legitimate basis to extend an investigatory stop to request to frisk defendant for weapons. Affirmed.
 
Officer had a legitimate basis to extend an investigatory stop to request to frisk defendant for weapons. Affirmed.
  
During a traffic stop, the stopping officer smelled methamphetamine, and the officer asked about it, and thereafter asked to frisk defendant, which led to more evidence. Because meth-users can be unpredictable, because defendant became nervous when asked about methamphetamine, and because syringes used by meth-users could be used as weapons, the officer had a reasonable basis to be concerned for his safety.  
+
During a traffic stop, the stopping officer smelled methamphetamine. He asked about it, and thereafter asked to frisk defendant, leading to the discovery of evidence. Because meth-users can be unpredictable, because defendant became nervous when asked about methamphetamine, and because syringes used by meth-users could be used as weapons, the officer had a reasonable basis to be concerned for his safety.  
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21413/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Toll''] 295 Or App 277 (December 5, 2018) (Egan) (Marion County, Hart)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21413/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Toll''] 295 Or App 277 (December 5, 2018) (Egan) (Marion County, Hart)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
'''POST-CONVICTION - Bases for relief'''
 
'''POST-CONVICTION - Bases for relief'''
  
Post-conviction court erred by dismissing as untimely claims that, petitioner alleged, had been dismissed by his attorney without his knowledge. Reversed.
+
Post-conviction court erred by dismissing as untimely claims that, petitioner alleged, had been dismissed by his attorney without his knowledge. Reversed and remanded.
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21229/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''Horath v. Nooth''] 295 Or App 163 (December 5, 2018) (Lagesen) (Malheur County, Sullivan)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21229/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''Horath v. Nooth''] 295 Or App 163 (December 5, 2018) (Lagesen) (Malheur County, Sullivan)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
'''EVIDENCE - Hearsay'''
 
'''EVIDENCE - Hearsay'''
  
Trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence that defendant asked his cell-mate to contact the victim before trial. Reversed.
+
Trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence that defendant asked his cell-mate to contact the victim before trial. Reversed and remanded.
  
 
The victim testified that she received the call from the roommate and the roommate had said the call was at defendant's request, but the roommate did not testify.
 
The victim testified that she received the call from the roommate and the roommate had said the call was at defendant's request, but the roommate did not testify.
Line 64: Line 64:
 
Trial court erred by committing appellant to involuntary mental health treatment. Reversed.
 
Trial court erred by committing appellant to involuntary mental health treatment. Reversed.
  
Although appellant was schizophrenic and had delusions that he was being pursued by the Mafia and a minor history of violence, the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was a danger to others.
+
Although appellant was schizophrenic, had delusions he was being pursued by the Mafia, and had a minor history of violence, the evidence was insufficient to prove he was a danger to others.
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21279/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. J.P.''] 295 Or App 228 (December 5, 2018) (Shorr) (Douglas County, Marshall)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21279/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. J.P.''] 295 Or App 228 (December 5, 2018) (Shorr) (Douglas County, Marshall)
Line 70: Line 70:
 
'''INTERFERING WITH A PEACE OFFICER - Interfering with the performance of peace officer's duties'''
 
'''INTERFERING WITH A PEACE OFFICER - Interfering with the performance of peace officer's duties'''
  
Defendant interfered with peace officer's duties when, during the arrest of another person, he recorded the arrest with a cell phone and moved around, coming within ten feet of the officer, and yelled and swore at the officers. Affirmed.
+
Defendant interfered with peace officer's duties when, during the arrest of another person, he recorded the arrest with a cell phone and moved around, coming within ten feet of the arresting officers, and yelled and swore at the officers. Affirmed.
  
 
The Court of Appeals explained that, by approaching the officers, defendant created an officer-safety risk, and the officers told him so before arresting him.  
 
The Court of Appeals explained that, by approaching the officers, defendant created an officer-safety risk, and the officers told him so before arresting him.  
Line 78: Line 78:
 
'''TRIAL PROCEDURE - Bench trials'''
 
'''TRIAL PROCEDURE - Bench trials'''
  
In bench trial, court erred by failing to explain its understanding of the elements of the offense. Reversed and remanded for the court to clarify its ruling.
+
In bench trial, court erred by failing to explain its understanding of the elements of the offense. Reversed and remanded.
  
Defendant submitted jury instructions in a bench trial and asked the court to state whether it agreed with defendant's interpretation of the law. The court declined so to state, preventing defendant from exercising his right to appeal.
+
Defendant submitted jury instructions in a bench trial and asked the court to state whether it agreed with defendant's interpretation of the law. The court declined, preventing defendant from exercising his right to appeal.
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21207/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Colby''] 295 Or App 246 (December 5, 2018) (James) (Lane County, Vogt)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21207/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Colby''] 295 Or App 246 (December 5, 2018) (James) (Lane County, Vogt)
Line 107: Line 107:
  
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21282/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Shamsud-Din''] 295 Or App 271 (December 5, 2018) (Per curiam) (Multnomah County, Albrecht)
 
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/21282/download#page=1&zoom=auto ''State v. Shamsud-Din''] 295 Or App 271 (December 5, 2018) (Per curiam) (Multnomah County, Albrecht)
 +
{{wl-publish: 2018-12-14 22:43:07 -0800 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin  Johnson IV }}

Revision as of 23:43, December 15, 2018

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Officer safety

Officer had a legitimate basis to extend an investigatory stop to request to frisk defendant for weapons. Affirmed.

During a traffic stop, the stopping officer smelled methamphetamine. He asked about it, and thereafter asked to frisk defendant, leading to the discovery of evidence. Because meth-users can be unpredictable, because defendant became nervous when asked about methamphetamine, and because syringes used by meth-users could be used as weapons, the officer had a reasonable basis to be concerned for his safety.

State v. Toll 295 Or App 277 (December 5, 2018) (Egan) (Marion County, Hart)

EVIDENCE - 403 Balancing

In sex-abuse prosecution, trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding, on 403 grounds, extrinsic evidence that defendant had been falsely accused of abusing the victim's sisters. Affirmed.

Defendant sought to offer evidence of prior accusations that had resulted in a mistrial, and argued that the prior unproved allegations were false and were connected to the allegations in this case. The court excluded the evidence as confusing and prejudicial.

State v. Perez-Garcia 295 Or App 156 (December 5, 2018) (Ortega) (Marion County, Abar)

POST-CONVICTION - Bases for relief

Post-conviction court erred by dismissing as untimely claims that, petitioner alleged, had been dismissed by his attorney without his knowledge. Reversed and remanded.

Horath v. Nooth 295 Or App 163 (December 5, 2018) (Lagesen) (Malheur County, Sullivan)

EVIDENCE - Hearsay

Trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence that defendant asked his cell-mate to contact the victim before trial. Reversed and remanded.

The victim testified that she received the call from the roommate and the roommate had said the call was at defendant's request, but the roommate did not testify.

State v. Now 295 Or App 169 (December 5, 2018) (Lagesen) (Deschutes County, Miller)

SENTENCING - Restitution

When two different events could have supported conviction for harassment, jury did not specify which it relied on, and only one caused pecuniary damages, court did not err by imposing restitution. Affirmed.

State v. Andrews 295 Or App 194 (December 5, 2018) (Garrett) (Malheur County, Sullivan)

EXPUNCTION - Expunction of juvenile records

Trial court did not err by declining to expunge a previously set-aside juvenile record establishing delinquency for sodomy. Affirmed.

Youth unsuccessfully argued that, because his adjudication was set aside as part of a diversion-like process, the statute preventing expungement for juveniles found delinquent for some sex offenses did not apply.

State v. P.T. 295 Or App 91 (December 5, 2018) (Armstrong) (Multnomah County, Tennyson)

CIVIL COMMITMENT - Proof of dangerousness

Trial court erred by committing appellant to involuntary mental health treatment. Reversed.

Although appellant was schizophrenic, had delusions he was being pursued by the Mafia, and had a minor history of violence, the evidence was insufficient to prove he was a danger to others.

State v. J.P. 295 Or App 228 (December 5, 2018) (Shorr) (Douglas County, Marshall)

INTERFERING WITH A PEACE OFFICER - Interfering with the performance of peace officer's duties

Defendant interfered with peace officer's duties when, during the arrest of another person, he recorded the arrest with a cell phone and moved around, coming within ten feet of the arresting officers, and yelled and swore at the officers. Affirmed.

The Court of Appeals explained that, by approaching the officers, defendant created an officer-safety risk, and the officers told him so before arresting him.

State v. Scheirman 295 Or App 238 (December 5, 2018) (James) (Coos County, Barron)

TRIAL PROCEDURE - Bench trials

In bench trial, court erred by failing to explain its understanding of the elements of the offense. Reversed and remanded.

Defendant submitted jury instructions in a bench trial and asked the court to state whether it agreed with defendant's interpretation of the law. The court declined, preventing defendant from exercising his right to appeal.

State v. Colby 295 Or App 246 (December 5, 2018) (James) (Lane County, Vogt)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Basis to stop

Police officer improperly stopped defendant by removing knife from his waistband, placing it on hood of police car, and questioning defendant about drugs. Reversed and remanded.

State v. Bese 295 Or App 254 (December 5, 2018) (Powers) (Yamhill County, Collins)

SENTENCING - Supervision conditions

Sentencing court plainly erred by imposing both prison and PPS conditions. Reversed and remanded.

State v. Lutcavich 295 Or App 263 (December 5, 2018) (Per curiam) (Umatilla County, Brauer)

INTERFERING WITH A PEACE OFFICER - Passive resistance

Refusing to obey police officer's order to leave the airport was passive resistance, and thus not the crime of interfering with a peace officer. Reversed and remanded.

State v. Estabrook 295 Or App 268 (December 5, 2018) (Per curiam) (Multnomah County, Bottomly)

CONTEMPT - Judgment

Trial court erred by issuing judgment of contempt that said defendant was "convicted" of a "misdemeanor." Reversed and remanded.

State v. Shamsud-Din 295 Or App 271 (December 5, 2018) (Per curiam) (Multnomah County, Albrecht)