Oregon Appellate Court, October 14, 2020
From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
by: Rankin Johnson • October 22, 2020 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> SENTENCING - Fines, fees, and assessments </summary> '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' '''CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency''' Evidence did not su...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<summary hidden> | <summary hidden> | ||
| − | + | CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency | |
| − | + | SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Probable cause | |
</summary> | </summary> | ||
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' | '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' | ||
| − | |||
'''CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency''' | '''CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency''' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
Evidence did not support trial court's finding that respondent would not cooperate with treatment was not supported by the record. Reversed. | Evidence did not support trial court's finding that respondent would not cooperate with treatment was not supported by the record. Reversed. | ||
| − | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/ | + | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A168312 State v. A.C.] 307 Or App 203 (October 14, 2020) (Armstrong) (Lane County, Merten) |
| − | ''' | + | '''SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Probable cause''' |
| − | + | Probable cause that drug evidence would be found in shed behind house did not extend to the house. Reversed and remanded. | |
| − | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/ | + | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A167421 State v. Nelson] 307 Or App 226 (October 14, 2020) (Aoyagi) (Marion County, Prall) |
| − | ''' | + | '''CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency''' |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ' | + | Respondent's methamphetamine addiction and long but sporadic history of minor violence were insufficient for civil commitment. Reversed. |
| − | + | The court explained that, although respondent was mentally ill and occasionally violent, his history alone was not an adequate basis for involuntary commitment whenever he went off his medication. | |
| − | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/ | + | [https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A172659 State v. H.M.] 307 Or App 246 (October 14, 2020) (Aoyagi) (Multnomah County, Johnston) |
| + | {{wl-publish: 2020-10-22 14:30:14 -0700 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin Johnson }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, October 23, 2020
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency
Evidence did not support trial court's finding that respondent would not cooperate with treatment was not supported by the record. Reversed.
State v. A.C. 307 Or App 203 (October 14, 2020) (Armstrong) (Lane County, Merten)
SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Probable cause
Probable cause that drug evidence would be found in shed behind house did not extend to the house. Reversed and remanded.
State v. Nelson 307 Or App 226 (October 14, 2020) (Aoyagi) (Marion County, Prall)
CIVIL COMMITMENT - Sufficiency
Respondent's methamphetamine addiction and long but sporadic history of minor violence were insufficient for civil commitment. Reversed.
The court explained that, although respondent was mentally ill and occasionally violent, his history alone was not an adequate basis for involuntary commitment whenever he went off his medication.
State v. H.M. 307 Or App 246 (October 14, 2020) (Aoyagi) (Multnomah County, Johnston)
