Oregon Appellate Court, November 6, 2019
by: Rankin Johnson • November 6, 2019 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL - Waiver </summary> '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' '''SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Staleness''' Evidence that defendant improperly...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Evidence that defendant improperly touched girls he coached, that ten years earlier defendant had photographs of other girls he coached on his computer, and that after his arrest defendant asked his wife to hide the computer, supported a warrant to search the computer. Affirmed. | Evidence that defendant improperly touched girls he coached, that ten years earlier defendant had photographs of other girls he coached on his computer, and that after his arrest defendant asked his wife to hide the computer, supported a warrant to search the computer. Affirmed. | ||
| − | The old evidence was not stale because photographs are likely to be kept for a long time. | + | The old evidence was not stale because photographs are likely to be kept for a long time. The court declined to rely on boilerplate about the affiant's "training and experience," but that did not affect the ultimate decision. |
| − | + | ||
| − | The court declined to rely on boilerplate about the affiant's "training and experience," but that did not affect the ultimate decision. | + | |
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/25117/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Gustafson] 300 Or App 438 (November 6, 2019) (Powers) (Deschutes County, Ashby) | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/25117/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Gustafson] 300 Or App 438 (November 6, 2019) (Powers) (Deschutes County, Ashby) | ||
| − | '''SENTENCING - Upward | + | '''SENTENCING - Upward departures''' |
Possession of a sharpened nail by an inmate was the offense of supplying contraband and, although defendant did not use it, supported a sentencing enhancement for a dangerous weapon. Affirmed. | Possession of a sharpened nail by an inmate was the offense of supplying contraband and, although defendant did not use it, supported a sentencing enhancement for a dangerous weapon. Affirmed. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/25118/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Miller] 300 Or App 459 (November 6, 2019) (Mooney) (Curry County, Margolis) | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/25118/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Miller] 300 Or App 459 (November 6, 2019) (Mooney) (Curry County, Margolis) | ||
| + | {{wl-publish: 2019-11-06 21:39:27 -0800 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin Johnson IV }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:12, November 19, 2019
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Staleness
Evidence that defendant improperly touched girls he coached, that ten years earlier defendant had photographs of other girls he coached on his computer, and that after his arrest defendant asked his wife to hide the computer, supported a warrant to search the computer. Affirmed.
The old evidence was not stale because photographs are likely to be kept for a long time. The court declined to rely on boilerplate about the affiant's "training and experience," but that did not affect the ultimate decision.
State v. Gustafson 300 Or App 438 (November 6, 2019) (Powers) (Deschutes County, Ashby)
SENTENCING - Upward departures
Possession of a sharpened nail by an inmate was the offense of supplying contraband and, although defendant did not use it, supported a sentencing enhancement for a dangerous weapon. Affirmed.
State v. Craigen 300 Or App 451 (November 6, 2019) Powers) (Umatilla County, West)
FAILURE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER - Events triggering reporting requirement
Although defendant left his old residence, he did not acquire a new one and therefore had no obligation to report. Reversed.
State v. Miller 300 Or App 459 (November 6, 2019) (Mooney) (Curry County, Margolis)
