Oregon Appellate Court, November 20, 2019
by: Rankin Johnson • November 21, 2019 • no comments
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
RESTITUTION - Medical expenses and plain error
Where defendant failed to object within an agreed-upon period to restitution for the victim's medical bills, the trial court did not plainly err by imposing it. Affirmed.
State v. Coons 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (Lagesen) (Polk County, Hill)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
EVIDENCE - Rule of Completeness
Evidence that defendant sought to withdraw his plea was not required to be included by proponent when the plea itself was offered in evidence. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 300 Or App XXX (November 20, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
