Oregon Appellate Court, March 3, 2021
by: Rankin Johnson • March 30, 2021 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> SENTENCING - Disproportionate punishment RIGHT TO PRESENCE AT TRIAL - Waiver PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE - Continuances EVIDENCE - Foundation for expert opinion </su...") |
Revision as of 17:07, March 10, 2021
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Cutting a safe open after it was taken from the owner was not theft by taking. Reversed and remanded.
Defendant was charged with, inter alia, aggravated theft, which could have been theft by taking or theft by receiving. In denying defendant's MJOA and his related jury-instruction-like argument, the trial court erred even though defendant was potentially guilty under other theories.
State v. Zimmerman 309 Or App 447 (March 3, 2021) (Armstrong) (Jefferson County, Hillman)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Disproportionate punishment
Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.
State v. XXX 309 Or App XXX (March 3, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
