Oregon Appellate Court, February 26, 2020
by: Rankin Johnson • February 28, 2020 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion </summary> '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA...") |
Revision as of 22:14, February 27, 2020
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
