A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, December 23, 2020

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • February 24, 2021 • no comments

(Created page with " <summary hidden> SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' '''SENTENCING - Disproportionate punishment''' Seventy-five month ...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
  <summary hidden>
 
  <summary hidden>
SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions
+
SENTENCING - Disproportionate punishment
 
+
RIGHT TO PRESENCE AT TRIAL - Waiver
 +
PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE - Continuances
 +
EVIDENCE - Foundation for expert opinion
 +
</summary>
  
 
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA'''
 
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA'''
Line 11: Line 14:
 
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.  
 
The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.  
  
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A170286 State v. Buckendahl] 308 Or App 125 (December 23, 2020) (Lagesen) (Multnomah County, Skye)
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
 
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
 
+
 
+
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
 
+
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
  
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
'''RIGHT TO PRESENCE AT TRIAL - Waiver'''
  
 +
Term in written judgment that failure to appear at restitution hearing served as waiver of objections was not effective because it was not announced in open court. Reversed.
  
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A171114 State v. Sidener] 308 Or App 155 (December 23, 2020) (Per curiam) (Washington County, Sims)
  
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
'''PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE - Continuances'''
  
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
Trial court erred in denying continuance as a result of surprise unavailability of defendant's expert. Reversed.
  
 +
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A170210 State v. Read] 308 Or App 164 (December 23, 2020) (Per Curiam) (Washington County, Wipper and Bailey)
  
'''SENTENCING - Consecutive probation sanctions'''
+
'''EVIDENCE - Foundation for expert opinion'''
  
Revocation sentences for a single supervision violation must be concurrent. Reversed.
+
Drug test on which pediatrician relied to form opinion was not admissible as substantive evidence. Reversed.
  
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/XXX State v. XXX] 308 Or App XXX (December 23, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
+
[https://link.ocdla.org/soll/A170252 State v. Prose] 308 Or App 167 (December 23, 2020) (Per curiam) (Washington County, Sims)
 +
{{wl-publish: 2021-02-24 12:51:31 -0800 | Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com:Rankin  Johnson }}

Latest revision as of 16:34, February 25, 2021

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

SENTENCING - Disproportionate punishment

Seventy-five month prison term for substitute teacher touching third-grade girl's thigh under her skirt was not disproportionate. Affirmed.

The court noted that the teacher had previously been suspended by the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission for having inappropriate relations with students.

State v. Buckendahl 308 Or App 125 (December 23, 2020) (Lagesen) (Multnomah County, Skye)

RIGHT TO PRESENCE AT TRIAL - Waiver

Term in written judgment that failure to appear at restitution hearing served as waiver of objections was not effective because it was not announced in open court. Reversed.

State v. Sidener 308 Or App 155 (December 23, 2020) (Per curiam) (Washington County, Sims)

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE - Continuances

Trial court erred in denying continuance as a result of surprise unavailability of defendant's expert. Reversed.

State v. Read 308 Or App 164 (December 23, 2020) (Per Curiam) (Washington County, Wipper and Bailey)

EVIDENCE - Foundation for expert opinion

Drug test on which pediatrician relied to form opinion was not admissible as substantive evidence. Reversed.

State v. Prose 308 Or App 167 (December 23, 2020) (Per curiam) (Washington County, Sims)