Oregon Appellate Court, August 7, 2019
by: Rankin Johnson • September 3, 2019 • no comments
(Created page with " <summary hidden> SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop SENTENCING- Merger EVIDENCE - Other-bad-acts SEARCH AND SEIZURE- Consent to enter and remain in residence </sum...") |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' | '''Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA''' | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''EVIDENCE - Impeachment with prior false accusations''' |
| − | + | Proffered evidence about victim's prior false accusations properly excluded as confusing. Affirmed. | |
[https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/24450/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Doyle] 298 Or App 712 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Lane County, McIntyre) | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/24450/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Doyle] 298 Or App 712 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Lane County, McIntyre) | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''APPEALS - Preservation''' |
| − | + | Defendant did not preserve argument that the state implicitly elected a specific prosecution theory. Affirmed. | |
| − | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/ | + | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/24446/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Steele] 298 Or App 725 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Crook County, Hillman) |
| − | ''' | + | '''EVIDENCE - Impeachment with prior conviction''' |
| − | + | 2011 conviction, following reversal of 1994 conviction, was within 15 years for purposes of impeachment. Affirmed. | |
| − | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/ | + | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/24447/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Phillips] 298 Or App 743 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, James) |
'''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | '''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed. | Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed. | ||
| − | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/XXX/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. | + | [https://cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/pdf.js/web/viewer.html?file=/digital/api/collection/p17027coll5/id/XXX/download#page=1&zoom=auto State v. Brown] 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX) |
'''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | '''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | ||
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed. | Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | '''XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop''' | ||
Revision as of 06:19, August 30, 2019
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
EVIDENCE - Impeachment with prior false accusations
Proffered evidence about victim's prior false accusations properly excluded as confusing. Affirmed.
State v. Doyle 298 Or App 712 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Lane County, McIntyre)
APPEALS - Preservation
Defendant did not preserve argument that the state implicitly elected a specific prosecution theory. Affirmed.
State v. Steele 298 Or App 725 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Crook County, Hillman)
EVIDENCE - Impeachment with prior conviction
2011 conviction, following reversal of 1994 conviction, was within 15 years for purposes of impeachment. Affirmed.
State v. Phillips 298 Or App 743 (August 7, 2019) (Ortega) (Marion County, James)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. Brown 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Duration of traffic stop
Questioning about drugs took place during an unavoidable lull. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 298 Or App XXX (August 7, 2019) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
