Go to the OCDLA website
OCDLA HOME
 
A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, December 8, 2021

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 11:56, December 11, 2021 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • December 10, 2021 • no comments

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[1] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[2] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[3] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[4] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[5] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[6] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[7] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[8] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[9] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[10] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[11] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[12] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[13] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[14] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[15] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[16] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[17] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[18] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[19] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[20] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[21] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[22] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Restitution
Importance: 3/5

After defendant was convicted of criminal-mischief for kicking the victim's car, sentencing court did not err in finding that defendant dented the car and imposing restitution accordingly. Affirmed.

[23] 316 Or App XXX (December 8, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

Retrieved from "https://libraryofdefense.ocdla.org/index.php?title=Blog:Case_Reviews/Oregon_Appellate_Court,_December_8,_2021&oldid=32146"