Oregon Appellate Court, April 21, 2021
by: Rankin Johnson • April 22, 2021 • no comments
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Trial court did not abuse discretion by excluding part of CARES interview. Affirmed.
In one interview, the victim described physical abuse but denied sexual abuse. In a later interview, she described sexual abuse. In sex-abuse trial, defendant sought to offer the entire first interview, to show the victim's demeanor when being truthful. The court excluded it as confusing. In affirming, the Court of Appeals found no error and also held that any error was harmless.
State v. Jasperse 310 Or App 703 (April 21, 2021) (Tookey) (Multnomah County, von Ter Stegge)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX AND SEIZURE - Conduct constituting seizure
Picking up leather jacket to remove it from a bicycle path following a motorcycle crash was not a seizure. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 310 Or App XXX (April 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
