A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, January 21, 2021

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 11:52, January 22, 2021 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • January 21, 2021 • no comments

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

EVIDENCE - Hearsay and witness availability

State should have sought a continuance to try to bring witness to court before relying on prior-testimony exception to hearsay rule, which requires proof of unavailability. Reversed.

The witness was reluctant, and had evaded service, and defendant's threats toward the witness also contributed to her failure to appear. But defendant's threats were not sufficient on their own to prove unavailability, and thus the state should have sought a continuance as part of making reasonable efforts to secure the attendance of a crucial witness.

State v. Cecconi 308 Or App 534 (January 21, 2021) (Egan) (Multnomah County, Hodson)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

SEARCH AND SEIZURE - Reasonable suspicion

Odor of marijuana in rented car with nervous driver coming from "source city" for marijuana did not provide reasonable suspicion to expand traffic stop. Reversed.

State v. XXX 308 Or App XXX (January 21, 2021) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)