Oregon Appellate Court, February 26, 2020
by: Rankin Johnson • February 28, 2020 • no comments
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Reasonable tactical choices
Defense counsel's choice not to give a closing argument, in order to prevent the state from giving a rebuttal, was not reasonable. Reversed and remanded.
State v. XXX 302 Or App XXX (February 26, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
