Oregon Appellate Court, January 15, 2020
by: Rankin Johnson • January 24, 2020 • no comments
Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA
TRIAL PROCEDURE - Subpoena enforcement
State's appeal. Victim is not a party, such that his failure to appear when subpoenaed is a basis for dismissal. Reversed and remanded.
State v. Lorenzo 301 Or App 713 (January 15, 2020) (DeVore) (Clackamas County, Norby)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
Yann v. Bowser 301 Or App 720 (January 15, 2020) (Lagesen) (Umatilla County, Pratt)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)
XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment
Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.
State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)