A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, January 15, 2020

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 09:02, January 18, 2020 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • January 24, 2020 • no comments

 

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

TRIAL PROCEDURE - Subpoena enforcement

State's appeal. Victim is not a party, such that his failure to appear when subpoenaed is a basis for dismissal. Reversed and remanded.

State v. Lorenzo 301 Or App 713 (January 15, 2020) (DeVore) (Clackamas County, Norby)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

Yann v. Bowser 301 Or App 720 (January 15, 2020) (Lagesen) (Umatilla County, Pratt)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)

XXX - Willingness to participate in treatment

Evidence supported finding that appellant would not voluntarily participate in treatment. Affirmed.

State v. XXX 301 Or App XXX (January 15, 2020) (XXX) (XXX County, XXX)