A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Appellate Court, August 21, 2019

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 07:41, August 24, 2019 by Rankinjohnsonpdx@gmail.com (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Rankin Johnson • August 23, 2019 • no comments


Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

APPELLATE PROCEDURE - Disposition following reversal

Trial court's error in taking judicial notice regarding voice-dial technology required a new trial. Reversed and remanded.

The court clarified inconsistent caselaw and explained that, if a guilty verdict in a bench trial was based in part on inadmissible evidence, it was unreasonable to expect a trial judge to reassess the evidence and arrive at a new verdict.

State v. McDougal 299 Or App 96 (August 21, 2019) (Hadlock) (Multnomah County, Ramras)