Oregon Appellate Court--October 17, 2018

by: Rankin Johnson • October 17, 2018 • no comments

Summarized by Rankin Johnson, OCDLA

INTERFERING WITH A PEACE OFFICER - Lawful order

Following mayor's request, police officer had the lawful authority to direct defendant to leave public meeting. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 389 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

SENTENCING - Mandatory minima

300-month sentence was not disproportionate for using a child in a sexually explicit display by man in his late forties committed by inducing 16-year-old to masturbate for defendant to observe. Affirmed.

Defendant, while in his thirties and forties, had numerous sexual encounters with teenaged boys, including some that had been reported to the police but not prosecuted. He was convicted of several sexual offenses, and the court imposed multiple concurrent 300-month terms.

State v. Horseman 294 Or App 398 (October 17, 2018) (Hadlock) (Washington County, Letourneau)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)

APPEALS - Plain error

Argument that prior conviction for UUW was not a predicate offense for second gun-minimum sentence was not reviewable as not plain error. Affirmed.

State v. Seidel 294 Or App 91 (October 17, 2018) (Egan) (Clatsop County, Matyas)