Oregon Appellate Ct - Oct 5, 2016

by: Sara Werboff • October 10, 2016 • no comments

Per Curiam - Remanding for Resentencing Due to Discrepancy between Court's Pronouncements and Judgment

The court remands for resentencing because defendant's judgment stated he was ineligible for any form of sentence reduction, but the trial court announced that he would be eligible for "credit for time served as well as good time and work time." The state conceded that the discrepancy between the trial court's oral pronouncements and the written judgment required the court to remand the entire case for resentencing.

State v. Pauley, 281 Or App 454 (2016) (per curiam)

Per Curiam - Civil Commitment - Sufficiency of Evidence

The court accepts the state's concession that the evidence was legally insufficient to show that appellant was a person with mental illness.

State v. J.S., 281 Or App 457 (2016) (per curiam)