A Book from the Library of Defense
Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Library Collections

Webinars & Podcasts
Motions
Disclaimer

Oregon Supreme Ct - April 23, 2015

From OCDLA Library of Defense
< Blog:Case Reviews
Revision as of 15:26, April 24, 2015 by Francis.c.gieringer@opds.state.or.us (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

by: Frangieringer and Abassos • April 23, 2015 • no comments

Witness Tampering - The Victim is the State, Not the Witness

The state is the victim in a prosecution for Witness Tampering, not the eponymous witness. Furthermore, a “vulnerable victim,” for the purposes of the aggravating factor codified by OAR 213-008-002(1)(b)(B), “has the same meaning as it has in the relevant statutory provision defining the offense for which the defendant is being sentenced.” Because the witness is not a victim for the charge of Witness Tampering, and the state of Oregon is not vulnerable, the vulnerable victim aggravating factor is inapplicable. State v. Lykins, 357 Or 145 (2015).